https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.in...der-neutral-unisex-children-a7925336.html?amp
Do we really need gender less when we already have a word for either. Unisex. That's means either can wear it.
I can't see how putting a dinosaur on the dress and the top, it suddenly appeals to girls and boys. If I liked dinosaurs my mum would just have bought the top ( not from JL I admit )
It was the wombles in my day and that appealed to children regardless.
I wear what I chose and I don't care if it's designed with men in mind. But I suppose I am more 'girly' the men's section doesn't tend to have dresses.
Our gender less horses are geldings, that means not a stallion or a mare.
Do we really need gender less when we already have a word for either. Unisex. That's means either can wear it.
I can't see how putting a dinosaur on the dress and the top, it suddenly appeals to girls and boys. If I liked dinosaurs my mum would just have bought the top ( not from JL I admit )
It was the wombles in my day and that appealed to children regardless.
I wear what I chose and I don't care if it's designed with men in mind. But I suppose I am more 'girly' the men's section doesn't tend to have dresses.
Our gender less horses are geldings, that means not a stallion or a mare.