I think it's dispicable but I still believe two wrongs do not make a right. Like I said in my earlier post, there are plenty of other horrific crimes against animals that go on in this country everyday but the existance of one wrong does not justify the continuation of another. If banning fox hunting brings the issue of animal welfare into the spotlight and widens peoples interest in issues such as intensive farming then it can only be a step in the right direction. Perhaps the governments time and money could better have been spent trying to improve farming conditions? But then you would have the outrage of farmers left out of pocket, people comlpaining about the increased cost of dairy and meat products on our shelves... whatever you do you're bound to upset somebody. There will always be people who lack compassion for animals and like to turn a blind eye to their suffering if they are to gain from it in some way, in the case of fox-hunting though this percentage of people was outnumbered and the law was passed. We can only hope in time the majority will swing in a similar fashion in other areas of animal cruelty in our country.
So what is more important at the moment, human suffering or animal suffering? Yes it would be nice if the government had the time and money to address all these issues and we the public had the money to pay the extra for the fluffy chicks we eat that had been hand reared in cosey appartments with room to roam away from the nasty predators etc. BUT for me i would sooner the government put some effort into sorting this country and its finances out. Reduced hospital waiting lists, free dental treatment, free prescriptions, reduced crime so I felt safe going out after dark. old age pensions etc etc etc
I am sorry but if I am of ill health, with no teeth, living on the bread line it will give me no comfort whatsover knowing the animals are all OK